Creating Market Pull

Posted on May 26, 2016September 6, 2016 by Jerry Vieira

“Market Pull results in higher marketing and sales ROI than Market Push and makes everyone’s life a lot easier. Ask B2B business owners which they would prefer, and you’re unlikely to find anyone that wouldn’t prefer to have customers lined up at the door asking to buy their products than having to coax them out of the brush to engage.”

Market Push

Market Push is exactly what it sounds like – aggressively pushing and promoting of your product to any and all that will listen. After all, customers can’t buy your products if they don’t know they exist. So, marketing must become obsessed with “getting your name out there”.

Right?

Well, not really. That obsession makes Market Push programs expensive and many times ineffective.

An all-out “get-our-name-out-there” initiative can lead a B2B marketing team to commit a lot of cash, time and energy to a scattered range of unfocused activities: a new branding program, a revamped website, new logo and newly-minted tag line, a blitzkrieg of trade shows, radio ads, an SEO initiative, a blast of pop-up on-line advertising or an aggressive social media program.

Source: Douglas Wray on Instagram, via Daring Fireball

I have seen firms spend in excess of 7 figures on Market Push programs with virtually no measurable results.

It’s a fall back, non-strategic shotgun approach. And, even if it works a bit, it typically generates a widely diverse range of customers. The consequences are that the firm doesn’t know where to focus next. They will likely be pulled in many directions by different special interests within this new, wide customer base. They cannot decide how to evolve their product offering road-map or what specific message to promote to whom. Debate can get heated. Spread too thin, they can become vulnerable to more focused competitive initiatives.

There is a much better way.

Create Market Pull

Now, contrast Market Push with the phenomenon of Market Pull.

After initially trying and failing with a Market Push program, a B2B client shifted to a focused Market Pull program and grew their customer base by three orders of magnitude in just under three years. The initial impact of the switch was seen in less than 120 days. Another customer hit two orders of magnitude in six years.

The question is this: How does one create market pull of these magnitudes? The compound answer may seem counter-intuitive, at first look.

It’s: Focus and Leverage

Market Focus: Tapping into the Natural Leverage of the Market Ecosystem

Each target market is a community. Each community has a natural architecture. We call this target market architecture the Target Market Ecosystem or TME. While all TME architectures are virtually the same in basic structure, (see below), each is unique in what’s inside the nodes.

Creating market pull is about building a reputation for delivering outstanding value to Economic Decision Makers in a specific target market ecosystem, then fanning the flames of the communication of that value proposition between peers, referral sources and through the other network nodes.

Within any TME, the ultimate goal is reaching Economic Decision Makers with your compelling value proposition.

For economically impactful purchases in the B2B world, Economic Decision Makers commonly look to knowledgeable, experienced people they trust within the market ecosystem for advice and recommendations. Filling those advisor roles are peers, technical specialists, lawyers, accountants, consultants and Board Members. We classify this group of advisors as Key Referral Sources.

Within that same TME community, there are also Opinion Leaders – those few knowledgeable folks who seem to always be at the front edge of new ideas. They might not hold a direct, open communication line to the Economic Decision Maker, nonetheless, they typically have significant indirect influence on them through their Key Referral Sources.

The most impactful Opinion Leaders are characterized by four traits.

They are Fanatic Believers in your value proposition
They are Well-Networked within the target market ecosystem
They have High Credibility with Key Referral Sources and Economic Decision Makers
They are Natural Sales People, anxious to communicate what they know and believe, to all willing to listen.

Also within this community infrastructure are a couple of non-people nodes – Venues and Vehicles. Venues are the real and virtual places where people in this ecosystem meet and dialogue: society meetings, trade shows, on-line groups, peer-groups, conferences, industry events and seminars.

Vehicles are the means through which people discover new information: webinars, blogs, podcasts, talks, videos, articles, industry journals and whitepapers.

The arrows in the ecosystem diagram, represent the directions of influence of each node.

It’s A Universal Dynamic

The social influence dynamics of a target market ecosystem are at work for everything bought by anyone. Its ubiquitous existence was clearly demonstrated in social research compiled by Professor Everett M. Rogers in his book “The Diffusion of Innovations” (Free Press, 1995). From community adoption of health practices in villages in the Andes, to the fan-out of new techniques for educating children in math in Pittsburg, to the adoption of high-tech products, the TME is the engine that drives adoption.

It’s Underlying Structure is Ubiquitous

The market ecosystem architecture for Hospitals is the same structure as that for Fire Departments – and every other industry. Yet, each individual TME is, for the most part, self-contained. Within it swirls the internal dynamics of market-specific issues, market-specific peer-to-peer communications, influencers, opinion leaders, venues, and industry journals spouting their own unique industry lexicon.

This insular characteristic means the Director of a Hospital, is not likely to hang out with, or seek the advice of, the Chief of the Boston Fire Department regarding how to select computer monitors for their delivery rooms. She will most likely, ask a peer at another hospital or a hospital IT specialist first.

Leverage: Kick-Starting Your Value Proposition Communication Multiplier (VPCM)

Your VPCM is the fuel that powers growth in a TME.

Social science research shows that “node-based”, intra-community communications is 13 times more effective than mass media in getting a value proposition message to go viral within a TME.

Having one of your happiest customers communicate the exceptional value delivered by your approach to solving their problem in a venue talk to 25 or more of her peers is an example of your Value Proposition Communication Multiplier (VPCM) in action.

The VPCM is most powerful within an ecosystem and, occasionally can even jump from one ecosystem to another. It drives market pull and sells for you when you are not in the room.

Opinion Leaders are important communication and influence nodes. One Opinion Leader can influence dozens, or even hundreds of Economic Buyers or Referral Sources in a specific TME.

Key Referral Sources are influence and communication nodes for your VPCM.

Venues and Vehicles are also VPCM communication and influence nodes.

“Strategically injecting an ecosystem-validated value proposition message at the right communication nodes is the key to creating market pull.”

What You Can Do Immediately

Here are three actions to create market pull in your corner of B2B world.

1. Focus

Select a target market where your value proposition has been validated to deliver higher economic value to customers than any other segment. Be sure the market has some economic momentum, lots of customers with a common problem your offering fixes and a well-established, easily identifiable TME.

2. Map that Market’s Ecosystem

Identify the Economic Decision Makers by title, Key Referral Sources by the same, Opinion Leaders, Venues and Vehicles.

3. Target your value proposition story at communication nodes within the TME

Build your story and marketing plan around your proven, delivered value proposition in that specific sector. Then proceed to place that message through blogs, articles, talks, referrals and presentations at the Nodes of the TME to get the natural lift that each TME offers.

Don’t get antsy. If you do it right, and your value proposition is real, then you should begin to see results in no more than 160 days. If you don’t see results something is amiss – and whatever it is, it’s not anything that could be fixed with an expensive Market Push Program.

*****

Jerry Vieira, CMC is the President & Founder of Jerry@qmpassociates.com. Read more about Jerry on LinkedIn and follow him on Twitter at @JerryatQMP

Overcoming the Fear of Market Focus

Posted on May 26, 2016September 6, 2016 by Jerry Vieira

“Not every customer receives the same level of value from your product or service. It makes sense that those who receive the greatest value are more likely to buy it, pay more for it, be happier with it, tell others like themselves about it and return when they need more. So, if you’re launching a new product, why not start there?”

I love this photo. It precisely captures the reaction of many clients struggling with stalled sales when they first hear the suggestion that a narrower market focus might be the best way to overcome their problem.

Their faces, and sometime their mouths, say, “Are you nuts!? We don’t have enough business now, and you want us to NARROW our efforts? We should be EXPANDING, not focusing.”

The truth is, many times broadening a company’s marketing and sales efforts is not the best cure for a stalled-sales situation.

Focus is.

The “Everybody Can Use It” Fallacy: The Emotional Fuel Driving the Desire to Expand vs. Focus

Quite often when I ask clients who their product is targeted to, they reply with a vague, “Well, just about everyone can use it”. The false corollary is then, “So, we ought to make everyone aware of it and try to sell it to anyone and everyone. Right?”

No, not really.

Why?

Because not everyone receives the same level of value from your product – and it makes sense that those who receive the greatest value are more likely to buy it, pay more for it, be happier with it, tell others like them about it and return when they need more.

So, while there may be some truth in the statement “Everyone can use it”, it doesn’t mean that you will be successful selling to everyone. You will be most successful, and get the greatest lift, from those segments in which the value proposition has the highest significance.

So why not focus on those high-value-received markets first, reduce your wasted energy and money and increase your success rate?

How do you focus like that? And what’s the risk?

First, pick the best market to focus on.

That market must have the following attractiveness characteristics for it to be worthy of your focus:

economic momentum,
a common problem that you can fix with your offering,
lots of people with that or a similar problem that haven’t solved it yet,
a strong economic (or other) benefit that accrues to the customer from fixing that problem,
a lot of peer customers they can tell about it, and
a well-developed peer-to-peer communications network

For new or innovative products, it is important to have a real customer to which you have already delivered that incredible value – a verifiable case study, testimonial and reference account.

Sometimes it only takes one or two.

I was once asked to help a Product Manager that had refused to focus and whose product’s sales were so bad it was about to be shut down. She spent all of her time increasing distributors across the country – because, “everyone could use it”.

With just a little customer analysis we found just two current customers within one market, that had, unbeknownst to the manager, received enormous benefit from the product – and with just a few phone calls and visits confirmed that the market they represented had all the characteristics of attractiveness discussed above.

We refocused efforts by tailoring the story for that market, reduced spending, increased sales focus and greatly increased penetration as a result. The largest single order from that market prior to focus was $20,000. After focus, within a year, the largest single order was over a million $. In addition, the number of large customers in that segment purchasing product went from just the original 2 to over 150. Finally, the average selling prices increased by anywhere from 2 to 4X, as customers in that market requested further market-specific product features.

This is only one of a number of similar situations in our archives.

Won’t We Miss a Lot by Focusing?

Focus just means your primary effort, targeting, messaging and resource allocations are aimed and tailored to your highest-value-received segment of the market. It does not mean you ignore other customers that unexpectedly come knocking. It just means that your primary attention is elsewhere.

So, service well the customers from outside your primary focus that unexpectedly arrive at your doorstep. Just don’t get too distracted by them. But, quickly analyze why they bought. A few may well represent yet another high-value-received segment to approach after you have developed a strong and comfortably defensible foothold in the first.

You must constantly be on the lookout for what Peter Drucker has called “The Unexpected Success”. An unexpected success is a customer buying your product from some crazy, unexpected market that seems, well, weird.

No, I am not talking about Portland, rather from a market segment that you can’t imagine why in the world they bought. As weird as it may appear at first, it could be an early indicator of high value received.

Constant vigilance will assure you don’t miss something big by focusing.

*****

Jerry Vieira, CMC is a Certified Management Consultant and President & Founder of the QMP Group. QMP is a Portland-based management consulting firm specializing in market strategy, marketing & sales organizational transformations and training & coaching. Read more about Jerry on LinkedIn and follow on Twitter at @JerryatQMP

Selecting the Best Market Strategy

Posted on April 13, 2015June 21, 2018 by Jerry Vieira

Strategy (noun): “A plan of action intended to accomplish a specific goal”

The 33 Strategies:

Robert Greene wrote a great book about military strategy entitled “The 33 Strategies of War” (Viking Press). Fascinating reading. In it, Greene analyzes the 33 strategies in great detail, citing numerous historical examples over the course of history from the ancient Greeks to the 21st century.

Along with the more well know strategies like “The Divide and Conquer Strategy”, several had intriguing titles, like: “The Guerilla War-of-the-Mind Strategy”, “The Controlled Chaos Strategy”, “The Strategy of the Void”, “The Death Ground Strategy” (not my favorite) and the “Ripening for the Sickle Strategy” .

Small-to-midsize business could learn a lot from that book.

But, with 33 strategies to choose from, few executive teams are able to dedicate the time and resource necessary to gather and analyze enough field intelligence, and then grind through the decision making and selection process, to pick the precise best strategy to execute. More typically the strategic planning process is done in a short time window each year, commonly facilitated by a non-strategic expert.

The six basic strategy alternatives – 3 F’s and 3 D’s:

Barring the existence of a proven tool or affordable expert to assist small to midsize firms in the selection of the best of “The 33” strategies, we suggest 6 basic strategic alternatives that executives might find easier to understand and select from.

The Frontal Assault Strategy:

A frontal strategy is a tempting, and typically, poorly thought out alternative that is too common in business. It is, many times, the default strategy. It can be paraphrased as, “Here is our product. It’s the best. Go out and sell it.”

New companies often have that strategy, and inventors and entrepreneurs are notorious for it when they say, in one form or another, “Everyone can use this”.

Frontal assaults typically fail.

Examples of famous failed frontal assaults in business were IBM in their assault on the PC market, Coca-Cola with their New Coke debacle and Segway with their assault on the personal transportation market. As an aside, neither Coke nor IBM’s powerful brand recognition helped them avoid failure.

Notable military frontal assault failures were Pickett’s charge at the Battle of Gettysburg during the U.S. Civil War, Napoleon’s assault on Russia in 1812 and Hitler’s assault on Russia (Operation Barbarossa) in 1941. Even Napoleon’s and Hitler’s huge, powerful and highly capable armies could not overcome the fallacy of the frontal assault on Russia with its immense land mass, winter weather and dedicated and committed army.

Frontal assaults are extremely costly, and research suggests that it takes anywhere between and 3 to 5 times the resources of the enemy (competition) is required to overcome a defended position in business or war.

The Fragmentation Strategy:

Fragmentation in business is the same as segmentation. Fragmentation allows a firm to focus their energy and their value proposition in a much narrower arena, increasing significantly their ability to develop a meaningful value proposition and establish a defensible foothold. Both development and marketing expenses are reduced and the outcome of product design focus is typically a much more relevant value proposition for the market, which ultimately makes selling easier.

The Flanking Strategy:

Flanking, in military terms, is differentiation in business terms. Differentiation allows firms to create a unique brand presence in the mind of the customer.

Flanking and Fragmentation go hand in hand.

The Defend Strategy:

Just as a frontal assault requires 3 to 5 times more resource to succeed, a defend strategy requires 3 to 5 times less resource to succeed. In business, overcoming a defended position is challenging for many reasons; the defender’s customer relationships and channel are already established, their brand name is already known, their customers’ buying processes and contracts are already established and all the support and service mechanics are in place. That’s a lot of bonds for the attacking competitor to break.

On the other hand, the defend strategy is extremely vulnerable to a Fragment and Flank strategy.

The best example I can think of is the Japanese success in the US auto industry. The Big 3 (GM, Ford and Chrysler) had become complacent in their market share. Together they owned 90% of the US auto market. GM had the highest share at roughly 50%.

The Japanese fragmented out and targeted the small car market where the US automakers had a poorly defended position, and quite frankly, had little interest in defending. Small cars simply didn’t contribute enough margin to the Big 3’s bottom line.

The demographics of the times (baby boomer new-household growth) were promising, as was the economic value proposition of the small 2nd car. Fragmenting and Flanking, based on quality and economics, were all that was required. GM now has roughly 20% market share.

That foothold was the first in a series of sequential fragment and flanking moves that took the Asian automakers from economy compact cars to luxury sedans and SUVs.

The Depart Strategy:

Sometimes it’s simply better to decide not to fight. Also called the “Cut-Your-Losses” strategy, it is better labeled as the “Reallocate-Your-Resources-to-a-More-Lucrative –Market-Opportunity” strategy. That more lucrative alternative would likely be a fragment and flank opportunity.

The Depart strategy comprises overlooking the battle field and simply deciding not to engage at all. The biggest enemy to overcome in accepting the wisdom of this strategy is pride. Executives must allow reason to triumph. The depart strategy is best utilized when it becomes apparent, that the enemy is well dug in, having a strong defensible position.

The Develop Strategy:

The Develop strategy is the common follow on to the Depart strategy. If the market opportunity is judged intuitively attractive, but temporarily impenetrable, after departing the field the develop strategy suggests that you remain engaged through intelligence gathering, looking for just the right opportunity to find a poorly defended fragment of the competitor’s market to attack.

The Best Strategy:

The point of all this that the only strategy that produces consistently good results is the combined Fragment-Flank strategy aka Market Focus and Differentiation. Whether your products and markets are mature or new, Fragment and Flank, or Segmentation and Differentiation is key.

*****

For more information about formulating winning market strategies contact Jerry Vieira, CMC at Jerry@qmpassociates.com , call to 503.318.2696 or visit the QMP Website at www.TheQMPGroup.com or connect with us through our Contact Us page.

The Law of Imbalanced Value

Posted on April 13, 2015September 6, 2016 by Jerry Vieira

Those of you who frequent my blog will know I occasionally make reference to “The Law of Economic Value”. I am now calling it “The Law of Imbalanced Value”©. The reasons will become apparent.

That law states:

“All economic value accruing to your firm has as its source, the customer’s perception that they will receive greater economic, emotional, political or physical value from your product or service, than it costs them economically, emotionally, politically or physically to acquire and use.” ©

When we consider any investment of time, energy, money or emotion, we hope for a meaningful return on that investment. We look for an investment that will make us more money (economic), make us feel good (emotional), help us look good to the right people (political) and/or relieve our stress or pain (physical). If some combination of those benefits are not envisioned, we will not be motivated to invest. If the mix of those benefits is not delivered in the optimum relative proportions, we will not re-buy.

The relative levels and mix of the four customer-received value attributes (economic, emotional, political and physical) is a business’ complete value proposition.

At the receiving end, a mix of those same four value attributes must be expended by the customer to buy and use a product.

A common example of the range of complexities associated with this law of imbalanced value and the relative value attribute mix, becomes apparent by considering the process of buying a diamond engagement ring. Imagine the complexity, mix and range value attributes considered in such a purchase.

Thank goodness our B2B world is simpler.

Or is it?

The Value Quotient (and why it must always be greater than 1)

Value, by definition, equals benefits divided by cost. It is a quotient.

The Law of Imbalanced Value © defines the Value Quotient as the Sum of Perceived Value Attributes Received by the customer (benefits) divided by the Sum of Perceived Value Attributes expended by the customer (cost).

This equation needs to yield a perception or feeling on the part of the buyer of a return much greater than 1, or much greater than break even. If that perception is not triggered, the purchase will not be worthy of consideration.

This means the value quotient must be significantly imbalanced in favor of the customer. It also means that the customer must consider all contributing value attributes in their decision process. It also means that a customer-centric marketing and sales process must incorporate the defacto creation, communication and use of that quotient.

The following questions can help you assess and appropriately adjust your value attributes to deliver a perceived imbalanced value quotient to customers.

1. Have you surveyed your customers to ask what value attributes they receive from your products and your firm – and in what order of importance?

I confess to being surprised when I did that survey for my own business several years ago. That answer was flattering, but not what I expected. The result of that survey was an increase in the amount I am investing in what they told me was important vs. what I had thought was important.

You will probably, need to face some cold truths when you see the results of your survey too. Then you must exhibit the humility and courage to reallocate time, money and people to reinforce what customers perceive as valuable. It may be painful, but the reward is less wasted resources on non-customer-value producing activities (see our related post on “Applying Lean in Marketing & Sales”), higher sales and higher marketing & sales ROI.

2. Do customers in all your target markets perceive the set of value attributes delivered by your product/service in the same proportions?

Probably not.

Sub-sets of customers with similar value-attribute profiles form a de facto market segment. Whether or not they fit neatly into, or can be labeled as, a traditional vertical or demographic category is irrelevant.

This kind of market segmentation, based on a common mix of value-attributes received, permits a narrow and cost effective focus on those segments. In these segments the profile of value-received delivers the highest value quotient to customers. This approach typically results in less price competition, higher differentiation and more effective peer-to-peer communication throughout your customer community.

In other words, a common value attribute profile defines your customer community.

3. Do your marketing and sales activities (from product definition and design, through marketing and sales, to customer service) consciously integrate and align the four customer-received value attributes with your target market?

Many small to mid-sized B2B businesses still adhere to a one-dimensional, surface-level economic benefits approach to marketing and sales. As differentiation they may tack on customer service and good relationships. This approach leaves too many unprotected dimensions of value that competitors will exploit.

4. Do your recruiting and training programs communicate and inculcate in your employees and culture your unique formulation of the Law of Imbalanced Value?”

A firm’s value proposition, its unique combination of the four value attributes it delivers, must not be left to the passive process of osmosis, any more than recruiting and training a new member of a football team can be left to chance. The new player must integrate into the team’s system, practice and train hard.

A Non-Action Call to Action

I call on you to think. Not do, but think. Not multi-task. Think.

This is the first, and most common barrier to overcome in achieving the insights and benefits that can accrue from designing your business around the “Law of Imbalanced Value”. Ask your customers, group them by common value attributes and optimize their value quotient.

*****

For more information on the process of optimizing the value model and incorporating the Law of Imbalanced Value into your business, call Jerry Vieira, CMC at 503.318.2696 or email Jerry@qmpassociates.com. You can also elect to describe your challenges through our Contact Us page

Escaping the Non-Innovative Product Development Box

Posted on April 12, 2015June 14, 2018 by Jerry Vieira

The Four Boxes of Product Evolution:

The figure below illustrates the basic four boxes of product development evolution. Along the horizontal axis we have Explicit and Implicit customer needs and wants. Along the vertical axis we have Conscious and Subconscious customer needs and wants. The intersection of these dimensions creates 4 boxes, or quadrants, each defining the level of basic and/or differential value your new product might provide to customers.

The Product Evolution Matrix:

To use the map, simply bulletize the product characteristics you are planning to develop, recording them in each appropriate quadrant. The further up and to the right your newly developed product capabilities fall, the more value they should provide to customers, the higher prices they should be able to command and the higher the innovative brand value they should create.

Think of what box Steve Jobs was working in at Apple – and what he was able to accomplish with Apple’s products and brand.

What to Expect in Each Box:

The Reactive Box:

Engineers and marketers using “Voice of the Customer” techniques to build the product development road map, can simply ask customers what they would like to see in their next generation product. This may be one step better than simply going off into the engineering “lab” and, in a vacuum, conjuring the product changes that the customers “should” like. But, this approach puts the firm squarely in the Reactive Box of our Product Evolution Matrix. A firm working in the lower left hand corner of the map, the Explicit-Conscious sector, is simply reacting to customers’ explicitly-stated needs and missing the opportunity to create unique value.

This is not necessarily a bad thing, unless of course, you stop there and do not venture outside of this box. If your competitors are working in the boxes further to right and up on the map – you lose. Working in the Reactive quadrant, provides little in the way of competitive, defensible advantage – because all competitors can do it.

Many developers elect to start in this box because it’s the easiest and path of least risk. If the redesigned product ultimately fails miserably, the product manager can always say, “Well, we gave them what they asked for. You can’t blame me for wanting to give customers what they explicitly requested.”

However, in order to achieve high customer-value product functionality, strong competitive differentiation and defensibility (all things that permit price premiums), a product manager must travel through, and out of the Reactive Box – upwards and to the right.

The Pro-Active Box:

Thinking in the Pro-Active Box requires a deeper understanding of customers. It requires considering their psychological, emotional and physiological motivations in buying, using and experiencing your product. For example: Consumers would not likely have asked for a microwave oven in the early 1960’s if a cooking stove manufacturer was asking questions in the Reactive Box. They didn’t know what a microwave oven was. Respondents, more likely would have said: “I’d like a clock that does not fail after a few months.” or, “I’d like a self-cleaning oven” or, I’d like a selection of colors other than simply white.”

It would have been unlikely customers would have said “I need a stove that cooks faster because I am pressured by time.” Only by understanding the subconscious, psychological and physiological needs of the primary chef in the house would a faster cook time have been recognized as a critical value needing to be delivered.

In the Pro-Active Box we think about emotions and subconscious physiological factors – not just functions.

The Insight Box:

In the Insight Box a product manager asks the question, “I know what the customer said they want, but what do they really mean?”

Take, for example, a customer observation that a first aid kit is difficult to open. What do they really mean? Does it mean, they have fat thumbs or does it really mean that, the life-saving components in the first aid kit need to very easy to access… fast! Is it a minor inconvenience or a life-saving need.

In the Insight Box we search to understand implicit needs

The Innovation Box:

When a product manager is working in the Innovation Box, he is bringing to bear all of the dimension of need: Conscious, Subconscious, Explicit and Implicit. The Innovation Box produces products that break with tradition, fulfilling needs people didn’t even know they had and providing features they never imagined they would love. The Innovation Box challenges product designers. The Innovation Box creates products that create iconic brands.

Steve Jobs lived in the Innovation Box. Thomas Edison lived in the Innovation Box.

Framing the Innovative Product within an Innovative “Experience”:

But, your job is not complete, even if you have worked our way into the Innovation Box.

Once a product manager has exercised their power of inquiry and thought in these 4 boxes or quadrants, they must then envision all of these boxes working within a greater bubble of the total customer experience. This means that prior emphasis on product features and capabilities must now yield priority to the customer’s total experience. The product must be integrally woven into the total environment your customer will experience in buying, setting up, using, servicing and communicating with your business throughout the life of the product.

This last exercise brings into play almost everything from order entry to repair and replacement parts. The key here is envisioning the perfect experience and creating and aligning all the key parts of the business model, and your organization, around that vision.

Experiential needs then fall into the same four quadrants for consideration. By blending an Innovation Box developed product with an Innovation Box developed experience, you create an true innovation.

Conclusions:

Never be satisfied with just developing product enhancements out of the Reactive Box. Reactive Box product enhancements rarely achieve price premiums, defensible competitive market positions or market share gains.

Even a thoroughly mapped out product enhancement plan that incorporates input from all the quadrants can fail on a bad holistic customer experience. The whole customer experience needs to be exercised according to the same 4-quadrant tool.

All aspects of the business must be aligned to deliver both innovative products and innovative experiences.

>>>>>

For more information about The QMP Group and it’s methodology for developing market and product strategy, call Jerry Vieira, CMC at 503.318.2696 or email to Jerry@qmpassociates.com.

Discovering the Gold Within Easy Reach

Posted on November 17, 2014June 21, 2018 by Jerry Vieira

I am always amazed at the cost and relative uselessness, for small to mid-size B2B firms, of formally published market research reports. Certainly, strategic business decisions must not be made in an informational vacuum, but expecting meaningful, actionable information to come from a general market research report, read by dozens, if not hundreds, of competitors, is delusional.

So, where should small to midsize B2B firms look for accurate, current, meaningful and actionable market data to support their strategic breakthroughs?

The Free Source of the Most Valuable Market Research:

Few small-to-midsize B2B businesses avail themselves of the hidden army of market researchers already at their disposal. That army comprises any and all of their employees that have regular interaction with customers or, their customers’ markets. That team includes the sales and marketing team, product designers, quality people, customer service, their suppliers and their procurement people. This army is already there and on your payroll. Take the simple steps to mobilize it.

How to tap that resource?

There are several low-no-cost actions a firm can take to extract gold from that untapped resource.

Make the expectation for discovering, recording and reporting market intelligence explicit and universal. And reward it!

The most significant growth breakthrough I have personally witnessed was identified by my client’s CFO who discovered, through a casual comment made by his next-door neighbor, an unexpected market for their product that no one had anticipated. A quick investigation revealed that the economic benefits received by the single customer they already had in that market were so significant that simply by refocusing the sales force on other similar customers in that market, the firm’s sales more than doubled.

The great business thinker Peter Drucker suggested that firms should pay particular attention to, what he calls, the unexpected success – no matter how small they may appear on the surface. These unexpected successes can signal huge growth potential.

To get the market intelligence gathering collection process started, some firms simply add a section to their employees monthly or weekly reports, entitled “Market Intelligence”. And it helps to provide public recognition and perhaps a surprise bonus for the most fruitful information provided.

Train the team on what to look for and how to ferret out key information

What to look for may encompass: bits of competitive intelligence, customer and user data, any information about the growth, health and what’s driving the customer’s markets, and, most importantly, applications and uses for your products that are innovative, provide high customer value and that you hadn’t thought of yourself.

Train and expect your team to develop heightened awareness, keen curiosity, ask lots of questions, and dig deeper into customer motivations, benefits and markets.

At another client, a very small volume, but rapidly growing, part they were supplying to a customer, was discovered to be an early indicator of healthy growth in an emerging strategic market. As in the previous case, a simple partial refocus of the sales team to that sector created multiple years of strong double-digit, very profitable growth.

Create a standard business process for collecting, analyzing and making decisions based on that information

A small company may have, when all hands are tuned on to market intelligence gathering, a dozen or more people regularly feeding their observations into an analysis and clearing house function. One individual, equipped with a good set of analysis tools, is all it takes to assess that data – and it’s not a full time job. But the rigor and discipline associated with that analysis must be maintained and acted upon for the results to be resalized..

That analysis tool kit must enable the sorting and validation of hidden customer value, target market attractiveness, competitive positioning opportunities and untapped market potential.

The only thing standing between you and reaching out for that gold that is within your reach, is simply the decision to do it.

*****

For more information on how to tap into market data gold laying there in front of you, call Jerry Vieira at 503.318.2696 or email to Jerry@qmpassociates.com

5 Steps to Assuring the Success of Your Branding Program

Posted on August 21, 2014June 21, 2018 by Jerry Vieira

A Good Brand: Cause or Effect?

Perhaps it’s a result of living in the Northwest for the last 20 years that I am periodically afflicted by the “salmon complex” – the uncontrollable impulse to swim against the current, despite obstacles. And so it is, I find myself in such a stream with regard to the growing pandemonium toward B2B branding programs. It’s not that I don’t believe that “Brand” has value, in fact, just the opposite. Brand has enormous value. It’s just that brand power is the effect, not the cause of B2B market success – and the strategic research proves it.

I have had the opportunity to observe a wide range of branding initiatives at B2B companies. At opposite ends of the spectrum, two come to mind. The first was a simple logo redesign for a small private company. The other, a million-dollar comprehensive branding initiative for a mid-market public firm. Neither initiative seemed to have any visible impact on the firm’s earnings.

After those initiatives had been in place a while, I asked the executives of each company whether they thought their branding program was a success. The answer, in each case, was an unequivocal “No”.

Not too long ago I gave a talk on market strategy to MBA students at a prestigious local university. At the end of the talk, one of the students approached me and expressed amazement and disbelief. How could I possibly give a detailed talk on market strategy without mentioning the importance of branding? He was agitated and animated, his arms waving about as he skittered around in front of me, like a drop of water on a hot skillet. It was as if I had missed stating the importance of water to agriculture.

So, why all the hysteria and stampede around branding?

Even though branding programs often fail to move the needle – their popularity remains ubiquitous. There are a number of reasons for this:

It feels good: A new brand. A refreshed tag line. A fantastic logo. A clean, well-constructed website. Looking at these products of a branding program makes you feel good. Customers can quickly see the highly visible outcomes. Executives smile at the wondrous accomplishment, reinforced by the adulation of their peers telling them how snappy it all looks.

The majority of the creative energy needed can be subcontracted to, and accomplished by, outside folks – minimally increasing anyone’s internal workload

Marketing and sales teams are hounding their management to spend money on branding

Branding gives the marketing team something concrete to focus their energy on – something on which to build a whole marketing communications program

Websites need to be constantly refreshed anyway – and a rebranding typically does that in a big way

There’s little downside risk, except for the money spent

Everybody’s doing it, and

Everybody’s selling it

Now, please don’t get me wrong. I sincerely appreciate the value of a good brand image in attracting customers – but a brand (the image, interpretation and meaning of your name, tag line and logo) is an effect not a cause, of success. What impact would the Apple logo have if Steve Jobs hadn’t first amazed the world with a steady stream of mind-blowing, innovative products?

What your company and its products and services mean to their target markets, i.e. the customer experience surrounding your value proposition, must have already been delivered and validated in the marketplace before a brand can be meaningfully established.

Strategic Marketing Research and RPQL

The voluminous PIMS* database and research from the Strategic Planning Institute, conclude that the customer’s perception of a product’s quality relative to its competitors, is the prime driver of financial success. This is called RPQL – Relative Perceived Quality Leadership. The research concludes that financial success is the outcome of achieving RPQL – and brand power is also a result of RPQL – not the other way around.

Quality means more than just “it won’t break”. It means that the product or service experience meets customer expectations – consistently delivering on its promises. And, delivering a relative perceived quality leadership experience takes consistent organizational rigor and discipline. No matter the logo! The customer must experience RPQL first hand, and then the synaptic connection can be made to the brand name and logo.

Achieving the Branding Impact You Intend: 5 Steps

Develop, deliver and confirm a meaningful value proposition experience first:

The Law of Value Exchange states, “The source of all economic value in your company originates from a customer’s willingness to exchange their cash for what, in their perception, delivers greater economic, physical, emotional or political value in return.”

Assure that your value proposition targets a market with substantial momentum and potential:

The world’s best boat, sporting the flashiest logo and most clever tag line goes nowhere in a river that is devoid of water. And remember, a brand has different meanings to different markets. Focus your investment and energy developing a meaningful RPQL experience in a meaningful growth market.

Don’t muddle corporate and product branding:

Smaller companies with petite marketing budgets often try to create one brand for the whole firm. But they may be serving multiple market segments with different products delivering different value propositions. In such a situation, it might better to focus branding budgets on specific products, vis-à-vis branding the whole firm. For example, the GM (General Motors) brand has been badly damaged recently by a torrent of recalls, however one brand RPQL experience (Corvette) remains solid.

Understand what your firm means to your best customers:

I asked new and returning clients why they buy from QMP. I was surprised; it really wasn’t what I thought. When I repeatedly heard the same reply, I immediately changed the corporate logo to reflect that perceived value and experience. Here is the QMP logo.

Yup. Our clients told us they engage with QMP because they gain invaluable insight because we challenge them to think.

Align your brand:

Alignment does not mean just marketing materials, fonts and messaging. It means your whole damned company. From employee recruiting, to training, to product design, values, culture and customer service. All components must be aligned to reinforce the customer RPQL experience – which is your brand. When you invest in that kind of brand discipline, your brand promise will be delivered.

*****

*PIMS stands for the Profit Impact of Market Strategy, a data base initiated by GE in the 1960’s to study the connection between strategy and profit. It is now maintained by the Strategic Planning Institute. It has tracked more than 500 key metrics of thousands of companies since the 60’s.

For more information on branding success contact Jerry Vieira at The QMP Group 503.318.2696 or Jerry@qmpassociates.com

Diagnosing Stalled Sales

Posted on March 13, 2014June 21, 2018 by Jerry Vieira

Just Ignoring or Pushing Through the Pain is Not the Answer

As an entrepreneurial CEO or owner of a small or start-up company, you probably don’t have the economic safety net to tolerate long term losses or less than adequate speed and growth in the adoption of your new products. You also may not feel you have the time or cash to stop everything, pull the team together, and completely re-visit your base assumptions and offering design. This is where panic sets in. What do you do?

Typically, if you ask your marketing, sales and engineering team what should be done, they will come to you with a laundry list of quick fixes: requests for price reductions, funding approval for new marketing initiatives or even more complex and higher performance product features which, they claim, are certain to turn around the problem. As CEO how do you know what to bet on? How do you know if you’re throwing good investment dollars after bad? How do you avoid having to seek out more funding and perhaps dilute ownership?

A number of years ago, I was asked to assess the viability of a new product that was struggling to gain traction in the marketplace. The CEO of this high-tech, pre-IPO firm wanted to know whether the product line could be saved. Sales were almost non-existent – profits negative. There was no breakthrough in sight.

The product manager of this line was convinced that if the psychological price barrier of $1,000 could be broken, customers would flock. The current selling price was $1,100. In the meantime, while price reductions were being considered (not seriously), the product manager was spending his time and budget setting up new distributors around the country, building promotional materials, stocking shelves with minimum quantities, training sales reps on how to demo the product and, in general, “flogging” (his word, not mine) and constantly “badgering” (my word) the distributors to produce more sales.

Two weeks of field investigation revealed a strategic opportunity to re-focus the market strategy. Twenty four months after that refocus:

– the selling price had increased from a $1,100 to more than $4,000. (Yes, it went up, not down!)

– the largest single customer order went from $20,000 to more than a $1,000,000

– the number of customers (hospitals) grew from 2 to more than 150

– the product-line, and the people, were saved

– the story added to the attractiveness of the IPO

And all this was accomplished while spending less in marketing, not more.

How was this accomplished?

This turnaround was made possible by discovering what, up to that time, was an ignored sector of the current customer base, where the product’s value proposition was significantly greater than for other customers. The business was then refocused on that smaller, yet more lucrative, group of customers. Focus allowed a reduced marketing budget. The result was greatly accelerated adoption, revenue growth and profitability.

Peter Drucker in his book, “Innovation and Entrepreneurship” calls this, leveraging “the unexpected success”. It’s accomplished by digging through the customer lists, examining the motivations of a customer that bought (that you didn’t expect to buy), and discovering that the value proposition they received was well beyond both what you imagined and/or what other customers receive. If you then discover that there are a lot more customers out there like that one, with the same problem to solve, you have a great place to begin your refocus efforts.

There are basically two phases to these kinds of turnarounds. The first is a high level diagnostic exercise and the second is a process for assessing and selecting a lucrative alternative target market.

Phase I: The Diagnostic Exercise:

In this phase we encourage a simple hierarchy of 5 diagnostic questions to start.

Question 1: Does The Target Market Have Momentum?

A dead man in a canoe will make forward progress if the stream is flowing fast – and a strong current makes up for a lot of inefficiencies in rowing, and can even compensate for inexperienced rowers rowing backward. Momentum covers a lot of sins. Inherent market momentum arises from fundamentals in the marketplace – demographics, economics or regulations.

Question 2: Is the Economic Value Proposition Valid?

In B2B, both new and mature products must provide meaningful and calculable economic value from the perspective of the customer. Customers buy for their reasons, not yours – and even though you may be convinced that your product’s value proposition is universally meaningful, it does not mean your customers see it the same way. And not all customers in all markets receive that value to the same degree. So it’s important to get your team to honestly validate the economic value proposition through visits to target market customers in specific and different market segments.

Question 3: Is the Competitive Position strong?

The fundamental value proposition may be provided equally by any number of competitive offerings or alternatives in the market place. Unless target market customers can easily see your competitive advantage and recognize it as meaningful to them – you will not be able to break through the competitive noise.

Question 4: How effective is the channel in Communicating both the Value Proposition and Competitive Differentiation to the target market?

If you want a quick way to assess this, simply ask any of the team (marketing, sales, or engineering or channel partners) to calculate the economic value proposition (benefit) of the product or service offering to a typical target customer. Ask them to do it on the spot… back of the envelope. I am continually amazed how major product development and marketing initiatives are embarked upon without the slightest consideration to this critical success factor.

It is the natural instinct of marketing teams to spend a lot of money at this level and they typically believe that a magic combination of branding, promotion, websites, trade shows, collateral, promotions et al will somehow turn around a troubled product line. If there is any indication of a fundamental problem in the three primary diagnostic levels that come before this one – spending on level four will be fruitless.

We’ll take the canoe-and-stream metaphor one step further. A dead man in a canoe floating down a stream with strong momentum will actually make more progress than a live man in another canoe rowing backwards. So not only do you need a solid market to support a valid economic value proposition, and a competitive advantage to communicate, you have to have people trained in how to communicate it… and do it well.

Question 5: Can You Consistently Deliver the Value Proposition?

Production and quality problems may be the cause of stalled success, but we rarely find that we have to go this low in the diagnostic hierarchy before we find the real cause of a market adoption problem.

Phase II: Evaluating and Selecting a More Lucrative Target Market

In each of the major turnarounds we have experienced in the last 10 years, the real key was not so much the lack of a meaningful economic value proposition, but rather a lack of focus on the segments of the market that would receive the highest economic, emotional or physical value from using the product.

All economic value transfer to your company starts with a customer believing that there is sufficient reason (economic, emotional or physical) to write a check to buy your offering. Different market segments will perceive and receive different levels of benefit from the same product. Markets with the highest value received will yield the highest selling prices.

The 12 basic evaluation criteria for assessing and selecting the most lucrative markets to focus on:

1. Market Momentum: By this we mean the degree to which the market has fundamental demographic, economic or regulatory factors driving its primary demand. Here’s a caution: many firms and marketing teams get seduced by this factor alone – mesmerized by the lure of big numbers. Even large companies fall prey to this lure. But remember, the largest markets always attract the largest and highest number of competitors. Most of the time, it’s a better strategy to focus on a secondary market. It usually less competitive, less risky, less painful and penetration is quicker.

2. A Common Compelling and Significant Problem: It’s common that if one customer in a market segment has a problem, many others, to varying degrees, will be facing the same problem. If the economic benefit of solving that problem is significant, it’s likely that the willingness to pay a premium for solving it will be present.

3. Economic Benefit to the Customer: Calculate the economic benefit for a typical customer in each market segment. The likelihood is that you’ll get the highest selling prices in those segments where the economic benefit-received by the customer is the highest.

4. Financial Wherewithal of the Customer: Do potential customers in this market have the flexibility to buy and capture funding should the economic value proposition be significant? For example, the University market segment is typically characterized by hand-to-mouth funding availability and long research approval cycles.

5. Profitability of the Transaction: This factor assesses whether transactions in this market segment can be inherently profitable. Factors affecting profitability might be geographic, customization required and willingness to pay for economic value received.

6. Match of Company Assets and Capabilities: The annals of failure are replete with stories about companies who were seduced into attempting to penetrate large emerging markets for which their basic capabilities, assets, culture and structure were mismatched.

7. Accessibility: To what extent are the market, the channel and the key decisions makers readily accessible to your channel and sales process? You can’t communicate a value proposition to someone you can’t get to.

8. Lots of Unfilled or Under-Satisfied Sockets: A socket is a potential customer with the problem and the possibility of receiving economic benefit form solving it. Customers may have one or multiple “sockets”. In assessing market attractiveness we want lots of sockets – most of them still unfilled – or filled with a less-than-satisfactory solution.

9. A Well-Established, Vibrant Intra-Market Network: Studies of the diffusion of innovation reveal that the communication through the intra-market network is 13 times more significant in the adoption of an innovation than mass media.

10. Level of Competitive Turmoil: This factor gets rated opposite to the others. If there is a lot of competitive turmoil, rate this low. If not much, rate it high.

11. Experience and Reputation Match: If the market you are assessing already knows who you are, and your value proposition is consistent with whom you are, your brand name and your differentiators – then you can give this segment a high rating. This is the factor that many marketing people believe that “Branding Programs” can fix. But even the best branding program can’t make up for a poor economic value proposition or poor market momentum – and branding programs are typically very expensive

12: The Availability of a Relative Perceived Quality Leadership (RPQL) Position:Research from the Strategic Planning Institute, concludes that the single most significant factor affecting a business unit’s performance is the quality of its offerings relative to its competitors. The degree to which an RPQL-position available, unclaimed, or vulnerable (if someone already owns it), is a key factor in the selection of a segment on which to refocus.

Conclusions and Recommendations:

If you happen to find yourself in a situation of a stalled product line or business – our experience tells us that the last thing you need to do is spend more on marketing. In general, a business refocus is a much quicker and less expensive road to success.

A quick assessment of the customers that have already bought usually reveals those for whom the value proposition is significantly higher. Assessing the attractiveness of the market segment that they represent can reveal your opportunity to break out to success.

******

Learn more about strategically improving low sales performance here, call us at 503.318.2696, email to qmp1@qmpassociates.com or connect through our Contact Us page

The Key Components of a Thorough Marketing & Sales Audit

Posted on January 10, 2014June 21, 2018 by Jerry Vieira

The word audit can strike fear into the heart of almost any person or organization that is its target. “Audit” conjures up images of someone in a position of authority digging through paperwork and records looking for evidence of malfeasance, mistakes, incompetence or non-compliance.

However, when a business performs an audit on their marketing and sales function, they typically just want to answer two basic questions:

What can we do to improve our sales results?
What can we do to improve our marketing and sales ROI?

At its purest intent a marketing and sales functional audit should not conducted to uncover incompetence, to fix blame or to penalize, but rather to discover opportunities to make both marketing and sales more effective. If the motivation of an audit is solely to find a scapegoat or assign blame, the problem is not in the firm’s marketing and sales function, but rather in its culture and leadership.

Step 1: A Quick Starting Point – The Self-Audit

We, at QMP use an 8 dimension, quick 50-question self-audit or self-assessment approach to determine whether there is need for deeper investigation. The output is a simple spider graph which illustrates the impressions that the executive team has of its marketing and sales organizational capabilities and effectiveness.

Figure 1

The shape of this figure provides a general idea of where performance gaps are perceived to exist. However, this is a chart which reflects executive impressions and personal observations – not a formal, detailed analysis of processes and capabilities. If the chart reveals high capabilities, but sales performance is actually poor, there is strong misperception among the executive team. But if both the chart output and the firm’s performance are satisfactory, the need for a detailed audit is probably not compelling.

(Click here to request this free self-assessment tool)

Step 2: The Detailed Audit:

If a detailed audit is indicated, the model in Figure 2 provides a framework for conducting that audit. Each of the 8 dimensions of the spider graph will be evaluated within that model.

Figure 2

he Marketing & Sales Engine™

All gears must turn efficiently and together for optimum revenue generation. If any gear is broken or stuck, the engine stalls – and it can only turn as fast as its slowest gear. If a marketing and sales audit is going to identify opportunities for breakthrough or discover where things are malfunctioning, an audit must assess the systemic working of all the gears – even the little ones. One must even include in the audit the oil in the oil pan – which we call Performance Excellence, or the Culture of the firm. A healthy corporate culture can grease, or an unhealthy corporate culture grind to a halt, the firm’s marketing and sales engine.

Auditing the Gold Gear: Market Strategy:

“Even the best soldier becomes a casualty when engaged in unwise battle strategy.”

Audits of Market Strategy often lead to the greatest sales breakthroughs. It is common that a strategy audit reveals a lack of market focus. And though it may seem counter-intuitive to consider narrowing rather than expanding one’s market range, a redeployment of resources to a more tightly-defined, more economically lucrative market segment, almost always results in accelerated growth and less cost.

In one case, prior to a strategy analysis, a rather smug marketing and sales executive said, boasting “I don’t care who buys them (his products) or for what reason. All I care is that they buy a lot.” His attitude reflected itself in the highly unfocused efforts of his sales team. This manager did not expect significant impact, nor did he believe much would be revealed, from a strategy audit. In actuality, the audit triggered a strategic market re-focus which triggered strong double-digit growth for a handful of years while enabling price premiums along the way.

Opportunities for sales breakthroughs are available by looking into other aspects of the firm’s strategy as well, not just its strategic focus. Breakthroughs can be found in analysis of the channel-to-market, pricing policy and the alignment (or rather misalignment) of all the components of the strategy together.

Auditing the Blue Gear: New Business Development

The Business Development gear comprises what most people consider to be classic, tactical marketing. It includes the firm’s e-commerce process, web presence, advertising, sales tool kit, lead generation process, print collateral, trade shows, branding, press relations, publicity and social media. Contrary to the intuition of many – more emphasis on this gear is not always better. Conflicts arise when the strategic intent is to focus while the tactical marketing team is hell bent on “getting our name out there” to as many people as possible.

A Business Development audit can reveal such things as: a) misaligned messages and focus, b) opportunities for shifting resources from expensive promotional efforts (trade shows, advertising) to more effective and less expensive targeted publicity and press relations, or c) a poorly conceived sales tool kit.

One of the most common gaps in a firm’s Business Development program is the lack of a “Thought Leadership” program. In general, thought leadership is the process of building a highly visible industry presence and reputation for your firm and your people, as industry experts. When people look for a solution, they often seek out the experts first – most of the time these days, with an internet search. Thought Leadership is typically the role of technical specialists, marketing spokespeople or senior executives of your firm – the people with enough technical or industry knowledge to be considered experts. “Thought Leadership” involves public speaking, writing and publishing articles, writing blogs, participating in industry association panels, conferences and committees and even involvement in community issues. That activity is heavily reflected in internet presence.

Auditing the Red Gear: Sales Process Disciplines

Within the sales function, the audit checklist is long. Here’s a sampling:

the reality, quality and current value of the sales pipeline
the usefulness of the sales tool kit
the relevance, effectiveness and currency of the sales training program
overall sales process effectiveness
the discipline of providing, and quality of, market intelligence feedback
the sales person’s understanding of the value proposition, differentiation and ideal customer profile, particularly for new products
the alignment of the compensation plan to the strategy

Something as simple as re-establishing focus on the Ideal Customer Profile can achieve rapid and significant results. While running a mini-audit, one of our clients discovered their sales people did not have a clear idea of the types of opportunities they should be pursuing. Sales sent in everything they dug up for a bid, swamping the quote department.

We took the client through a focus exercise and profiled the ideal opportunity. It took only a couple of hours to formulate. Within 9 months of this re-focus, their win rate had increased by more than 15% while the number of quotes generated decreased by nearly 33%. They won more of the right kinds of profitable opportunities. It was that simple. Less waste. More success. No blame.

Low-to-no-cost adjustments to issues discovered in an audit are common and can significantly increase sales productivity.

For example, research has shown that 35% to 50% of the customer opportunities in a sales person’s pipeline will never reach a “buy” decision. These are costly, unproductive investments of sales and support resource that have ended up in the “No Decision” bucket.

The likelihood of an opportunity ending in a “No-Decision” is inversely proportional to the degree of the “Compelling Need” a customer feels about solving their business problem. If a customer is not faced with a compelling need to fix their problem they will not buy any solution – yours or your competitor’s. A quick audit of the sales opportunities in the “No Decision” bucket brings cold reality to bear on the need to do a better job of qualifying customers.

Auditing the Soil: Performance Excellence, aka the Culture:

Think of a company’s culture as its soil. At its best, it is nutrient rich and encourages growth. Think of strategy as the seed. Even a genetically perfect seed will not grow in nutrient starved soil. On the other hand, a genetically inferior seed, planted in nutrient rich soil, will at least yield some crop. Culture is everything.

The nutrients in a firm’s culture are its values and its behavioral norms. In our experience, the best cultures exhibit the following characteristics:

the setting of clear expectations
individual and organization accountability
clarity of ownership of initiatives and results
measurements and metrics
rewards and consequences tied to performance
honesty and openness in communications
periodic progress checkpoints (at minimum, monthly)
a sense of urgency to deal with barriers and challenges to progress
teamwork
a creative problem-solving orientation focused on solutions not blame

In our engine model the culture is the oil in the oil plan pan in which the gears move. The culture lubricates and sustains a healthy engine. Without oil the engine seizes up. Without a solid culture of performance excellence, your business seizes up.

Conclusion:

A marketing and sales audit is simply a periodic analysis of what’s working and what’s not. It is a discipline that requires digging into the marketing and sales process to look for opportunities, barriers, bottlenecks and trends. We know from experience, that initiating an audit and analysis, with the discovery of root cause as its objective can spark sales breakthroughs and improve marketing & sales ROI.

A Final Note: A Marketing & Sales Organizational Self-Assessment is not the same as a Marketing & Sales Audit

A Self-Assessment is an organized compilation and scoring of your perceptions about the capabilities of your marketing and sales organization and processes. An Audit is a validation or invalidation of those perceptions from a deep dive into weaknesses and root causes of performance gaps. Self-Assessments record perceptions. Audits discover reality.

*********

Learn more about what kinds of growth opportunities a QMP Marketing and Sales Effectiveness Audit can reveal. Or, request a free QMP Marketing and Sales Organizational Capabilities Self-Assessment through our Contact Us Page. We’re here to help.

The Need for Asset Optimization Discipline

Posted on May 2, 2013August 25, 2014 by Jerry Vieira

When the going gets tough …

… most business executives cut expenses. Consultant services are among the first to go. In tough economic times we consultants too-frequently hear some variation of, “Your proposal is great, but we simply don’t have the cash at this time to move ahead with it”. And lest you consider this blog posting an appeal to businessmen to hire consultants, let me assure you right-out, it is not. It is an appeal to businessmen to adopt an asset and investment optimization discipline and thus create a powerful force for growth, in both good and bad economic times.

By asset optimization I mean a process for assuring that every dollar of cash, every employee and every hour of time is aligned and consistently targeted at the best possible opportunity for growth – and if it isn’t, to re-target it. A process for executing that optimization exercise follows and is offered for you to consider.

Step 1: Make an initiative attractiveness wish-list

Identify 6 high-yield, high-probability-of-success bottom-or-top line growth initiatives you could embark upon if your organization had the cash, talent and/or the time. Next to each item put the name of the best talent available to execute that initiative along with an estimate of the amount of cash and time (calendar months) it would take to execute that project. Rank the initiatives on the list from highest to lowest in terms of most attractiveness. Keep this list fresh by updating it no less than once a month.

Step 2: Search internally for assets (time, talent and cash) to reallocate

Identify currently committed assets that are the least productive in your company. I have found that a large percent of managers and owners do not want to confront this step, largely because it forces a look at non-productive employees, legacy initiatives and pet-projects.

As an example: If an owner has 100 employees, is it likely there are two that are marginally productive? Assuming for the moment that their cash outlay is $40,000 each, eliminating their positions would free up $80,000 for alternative investment.

There are certainly other sources of potential asset re-allocation and making employment decisions is emotionally difficult, for certain. Nevertheless, barring the emotional pain of confronting this particular an alternative, the list of potential resources that could be reallocated should be identified for each initiative.

Step 3: Make the tough asset re-allocation decisions

This step is why owners and GM’s get paid the big bucks – to make decisions on asset utilization.

A general on the battlefield does this all the time. He is constantly looking for points in the line at which to target his battlefield assets. He continually sends out patrols to discover opportunities to exploit to generate breakthroughs. Assuming his orders are not simply to hold, the good general always knows which segments of his line to hold and at which to launch an attack

If there is anything I would wish for owners and managers it a decisiveness gene

I recently experienced a client who delayed a critical asset-reallocation decision for a year, only acting when an emergency arose.

Why is such an approach is not used more often?

Through the years I have discovered three primary reasons that small-to-mid size business owners and managers don’t practice this discipline: 1) they simply never thought of it, consumed by day-to-day crisis-driven issues, 2) they want avoid having to make the tough decisions it points them to and 3) no one has held them accountable for working through such an exercise.

A consultant can only help them with the first.

*****

Learn more about the QMP Group and how it can transform your organization into a powerful engine for growth